Forum
Have smaller tables (2,3,4,5 & 6 players)
the_maverick wrote
at 6:42 PM, Wednesday July 26, 2006 EDT |
137 people think this is a good idea
Lblack wrote
at 1:47 PM, Sunday January 4, 2009 EST i do agree tables should seat at most 7...the pace would pick up and u would see better hands(on smaller tables)...now the bigger ones should stick with 9....plus i think the freeroll # needs to be pushed to 100
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 2:15 PM, Sunday January 4, 2009 EST I'd just like to see more choice.
Full 9 player tables are horribly slow. |
black-lighter wrote
at 5:00 PM, Thursday January 8, 2009 EST bring on the smaller tables...playing usual tables are slow,very slow.....gets boring
|
Deano Supremo wrote
at 7:08 PM, Thursday January 8, 2009 EST Brilliant Idea!
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 8:36 AM, Friday January 9, 2009 EST Ryan, please, please do this. For a coding point of view it must be dead easy. Full 9 player rings can be really tedious.
|
FokZ wrote
at 11:57 AM, Saturday January 10, 2009 EST i would love to see 6 handed tables, i always look for the tables that arent full, but they always fill up (too) quickly, which i hate.
ryan, you could test this for a month, or 2, to see how much people like them, in addition to the 9 handed tables. would make me like gpokr alot more, and i guess there are alot of ppl that feel the same. |
El Brujo wrote
at 9:49 AM, Tuesday January 27, 2009 EST Gurgi, be nice if on a heads up table the players could select the level of the blinds.
|
biskyree wrote
at 6:20 AM, Monday February 2, 2009 EST tables for 5 people ??
weird HeadsUp, 6 max, full ring.... may as well stay the same as the majority |
Danny_DCB wrote
at 11:31 AM, Thursday February 5, 2009 EST bumb
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 8:15 AM, Friday February 13, 2009 EST double bump
|