Forum
Quads back to back
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 10:46 AM, Friday November 16, 2012 EST BV turns quad 4s against Swoop's full house. Starting Hand swoop4meat raises $2,000 william shatnerf folds dolfin raises $3,000 sorryboutit folds mark07 calls 86And86 folds bvillepa calls swoop4meat raises $2,000 dolfin calls mark07 calls bvillepa calls Dealing flop: [7c, 4c, Ah] bvillepa checks swoop4meat bets $1,000 dolfin raises $102,000 mark07 folds bvillepa folds swoop4meat sits out swoop4meat folds dolfin wins main pot $119,500 Starting Hand swoop4meat sits in JulesDogg takes a seat william shatnerf folds dolfin folds sorryboutit folds mark07 folds 86And86 calls bvillepa calls swoop4meat raises $1,000 86And86 calls bvillepa calls Dealing flop: [As, 4h, Ad] bvillepa bets $1,000 sorryboutit sits in swoop4meat calls 86And86 folds Dealing turn: [4d] bvillepa bets $1,000 swoop4meat raises $2,000 bvillepa calls Dealing river: [9h] bvillepa bets $9,000 swoop4meat raises $18,000 bvillepa raises $23,000 86And86 stands up swoop4meat raises $61,000 bvillepa raises $58,000 swoop4meat calls bvillepa shows [4c, 4s] for four fours swoop4meat shows [Js, Ah] for a full house, Aces full of fours bvillepa wins main pot $192,000 Very next hand I turn quad 8s against nothing (sadly). Starting Hand Dealing pocket cards: [8c, 8d] william shatnerf calls dolfin folds sorryboutit folds mark07 calls bvillepa folds JulesDogg calls swoop4meat checks Dealing flop: [Ad, 8s, 2d] JulesDogg bets $2,750 swoop4meat folds william shatnerf calls zivas11 takes a seat mark07 calls Dealing turn: [8h] wojslaw takes a seat JulesDogg bets $3,000 william shatnerf folds mark07 calls Dealing river: [6c] JulesDogg bets $15,000 mark07 folds JulesDogg wins main pot $33,250 The probability of this happening is 1 in 17,500,000 approx., which is very, very small. |
|
ipiss15kilosagai wrote
at 12:33 PM, Friday November 16, 2012 EST yes real life 1:17500000, but rigged ass gpokr this happens every hour!
|
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 2:50 PM, Friday November 16, 2012 EST Piss have you ever read the reviews by losing players of real money online sites?
They ALL say that they are rigged. Rigged to keep new players in, rigged to make more rake, rigged for this, rigged for that and so it goes on. And they all say this because they are losing players and it's in human nature to look for blame elsewhere! The more you go on about it, particularly concerning a FREE TO PLAY site such as gpokr, the more bitter and ridiculous you sound. For heaven's sake man, it is not easy to program an RNG to be deliberately rigged and if a programmer had spent all those hours/days/weeks breaking (rigging) the RNG on the developers instructions who would benefit? Where is the gain? Where is the motivation? It makes no sense whatsoever. All we have here is a poor quality RNG algorithm, that is comparatively weak at creating randomness. Claiming it is rigged suggests that outcomes are changed deliberately to favor a particular player and as anyone with an ounce of sense would know, when there is no money involved it would be a futile exercise. Getting worked up because you lose and shouting 'RIGGED' doesn't make it so. Quoting a few 'RIGGED' anecdotes about your AA losing to 74 doesn't make it so. To be quite honest, to anybody with a modicum of common sense, your claims sound utterly preposterous. And I guess the bottom line is that if you hold to your beliefs then more fool you for playing here since there are quite literally hundreds of other sites you could play at. Perhaps you could explain, with a decent logical argument that can bear close scrutiny, exactly how you draw the conclusions that you harp on about so frequently but I seriously doubt that you can do that. I eagerly await your logical and rational argument that supports your (crazy) claims (lmao). |
|
cottonhead wrote
at 3:00 PM, Friday November 16, 2012 EST Jules your intellect is so overwhelming to this southern man in the states I would need to get you drunk just to be be able to have a conversation that would be equal to both parties.....lol. What you have written however about the site being rigged does seem to make sense, at least I think it does. Good luck & have a great day.
|
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 3:15 PM, Friday November 16, 2012 EST Hi Cotton, good luck too you to sir.
|
|
girlygirl wrote
at 9:49 PM, Friday November 16, 2012 EST Jules knows what he's talking about....smiles at cotton
|
|
ThamesBoy wrote
at 2:54 PM, Saturday November 17, 2012 EST I've been playing an hour and haven't seen quads once
|
|
ipiss15kilosagai wrote
at 10:50 PM, Saturday November 17, 2012 EST Jules, Not a problem I will be glad to educate the poorly educated gpokr community. First of all let me dissect your false statements of fact about motivation for someone purposely creating a "free" poker site for absolutely no reason. #1 Nothing in life is done for free and I know for a fact Ryan is not a millionaire/billionaire with nothing better to do than make a legitmately free poker site. As I feel that you cant smell your own shit on your knees I will offer you some real life roi for "rigging" a "free poker " site. ---Pay real close attention around the table, those ads you see pop up, they are not "free" some one is paying Ryan for those. Marketing 101 says you must present the four factors of impulse for an investor to invest in the "free" poker , put my add up there . Hence, I use the word "rig" as any author knows you have to 5th grade level for comprehensive purposes to this mildy educated gpokr audience. It is rigged because texas holdem is a moderate to extremely boring game waiting on "good hands" to execute actually playing. So, lets make it FuNNNNN! rig it by increasing the odds so every other hand is a showdown, that way everyone stays and plays because its now "wildly" entertaining. So more people that are signed up the more Ryan can show investors he has xxx number of signees. this is substantiated by the FACT that NO ONE can delete their account from gpokr! The more people playing, the more he can CHarge (not free) for the ads!!! THis makes your debate and argument MOOT! I know how to argue, and I win!! ask the 10 year BPR attorney whose ass I just kicked at the Supreme Court building last week and had everything vacated, Im not even an attorney! So there is your awaiting argument Please respond with more big words and get a clue. I will not respond to any more of your outbursts of me having to explain Im sure you are smart, but I doubt it.
|
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 2:50 PM, Sunday November 18, 2012 EST Piss, congratulations on 'kicking an attorney's ass'. That's awesome, hardcore and irrelevant.
Now, before reading on remember I am not the guy making unsubstantiated claims, you are! Your claims, in my opinion, are at best shaky and at worst utterly unfounded and baseless. So what do we learn from your post exactly? Do we learn that the showing advertisements provides tangible, credible and indisputable evidence of tampering with the RNG? I know that is what you would have us believe but you show us no evidence to back the claim. You assert that if a free poker website carries advertisements that provides irrefutable proof that the RNG algorithm is corrupt. But, of course, that is not strictly true is it? In fact it provides no proof whatsoever. You could ask your attorney friend his opinion about that one. It's a bit like saying that if I hate Jack and Jack gets murdered then I must be the culprit because I hated Jack. Enough to convict? Hardly! I honestly believe that you believe the site is rigged but since it's a free site I fail to comprehend why you're so emotionally invested in the subject. However, what really beggars belief is the fact that you still frequent the site at all. Every poker site on the planet has it's vocal minority that claim their site is rigged. The internet is full of them, they're like conspiracy theorists, full of guff, tenuous connections, zero proof and plenty of anger. The difference being that they have genuine political concerns rather than trivial concerns about whether or not a free poker site is cool or not. If you really want to continue the debate you're going to have to deliver some real evidence, some real proof. Asserting that adverts present evidence of corruption holds no water. It is not proof of anything at all. Anyhow since you hate this place for it's riggedness I'll see you at Poker Stars. But before you create an account there be careful and read this first. http://fuckpokerstars.com/ OK, let's try Party Poker ~ http://forum.ixgames.com/party-poker-forum/16325-party-poker-rigged.html They're rigged too, how about 888 Poker then. http://my.888poker.com/go/thread/view/111150/26417209/website-is-so-rigged-its-unbelievable Nevermind, we'll find a non-corrupt site eventually. Whoops, Titan Poker is rigged as well http://www.cardschat.com/f10/incredible-rigged-i-tell-you-rigged-67607/ Now you'll really like this one, here we have 100s, maybe 1000s of losing players like yourself who make claims they can't prove about sites being rigged. http://www.pokerscout.com/RecentReviews.aspx Time to put up or shut up. Show me proof and we have something of interest but I'm growing tired of reading baseless assertions. I want something of substance, something real, something absolute! Not irrelevancies about kicking attorney ass, not statements saying there are adverts so that means corruption. It won't do, it isn't good enough, it doesn't further your claims. It is nada, zip, zilch, nil, nothing. Do better! Give me something that provides unquestionable proof and I'll be the first to hold my hands up and say well done, thank you. Until then I'll have to ignore your rantings even though they are amusing. I do have one burning question though. If you believe the site to be corrupt, tell me, why are you even here at all? Are you trying to save the gpokr community from this dreadful corruption? I doubt that. Are you shedding light on a serious conspiracy? Nope Are you here to enlighten the masses? Hmmm, perhaps not. Are you just being a diligent and helpful citizen? Nah So what, exactly, are you doing? Are you taking a piss into a stiff headwind with no possible benefit for you or anybody else? Well maybe that's the case. Are you sounding off, feeling bitter, venting anger? That might be it. So whilst you're pondering on a response remember your remit as plaintiff. Demonstrate your claim by means of proof, that's all I ask. |
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 2:57 PM, Sunday November 18, 2012 EST Hey Piss, one more thing, if you do respond is there any chance you could use paragraphs and punctuation? The last post was tough to read all in one block with a jumble of 'creative' punctuation scattered about the place. Many thanks, Jules
|
|
ipiss15kilosagai wrote
at 3:58 PM, Sunday November 18, 2012 EST I'm sorry! YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! my time is more valuable than trying to explain logic and reality to a one sided mind. I am not sure how old you are, but when you grow up you will realize that nothing is "FREE". This conversation with my input is over. I have a life, No need to wright a novel of explanation on a poker site! Good luck sweetheart and take care!
|