Forum
Advisor Blog
Reviews
Strategies
Ideas
How to have your cake (NSFW stuff), and eat it too (be family-friendly)!
|
RoverRoverRover wrote
at 10:34 PM, Thursday January 4, 2007 EST
Before we fracture the gpokr community over whether NSFW avatars and names should be allowed, I think we should come up with a way to let the horny teenagers and dirty old men have their booby pictures and GOATFUCKERS, while the kids at the library or ppl at work can have a safe, non-obscene way to play.
I propose we let players voluntarily flag their avatar as NSFW (or the community can vote on it, or appeal to Ryan to set the flag). Then, make a safe-mode that you can enable if you want to hide all the NSFW avatars. When safe-mode is on, it could also filter naughty names to appear like GOATF***ER, or whatever. This way, everyone can choose whether they want a clean or NSFW experience without complete censorship. |
Replies 1 - 5 of 5
|
Ryan wrote
at 11:30 PM, Thursday January 4, 2007 EST Thats a genius nice solution.
'cept it means more work for me :( |
|
cAPSLOCK wrote
at 11:46 PM, Thursday January 4, 2007 EST Sounds like a great idea to me.
|
|
AtaPoker wrote
at 8:32 AM, Friday January 5, 2007 EST Excellent.
1. option for voluntary flag 2. option to flag someone, 3 flags = NSFW 3. maybe an option for Ryan to flag 3 times but I think this wont be nessesary. Btw, thx to CapsLock for the way he or she brought this up. Very balanced. Wisdom. |
|
ABNRanger wrote
at 11:57 AM, Saturday January 6, 2007 EST This isn't as complete of a solution as Rover3's, but you could put up some sort of prominent banner that states how easy it is to click once on someone's avatar to turn it back into a smiley face.
You could also maybe put a swear filter on the name field when someone registers. |
|
BlackHorizon wrote
at 8:10 PM, Monday January 8, 2007 EST A block-all-avatars option would also be good.
If names and chat were also a concern wrt nsfw, perhaps you could block them too. |
