| Explanation | Action | Advisor | Date |
|---|
| The mentioning about the permaban was always meant to scare you a bit. It was never clear enough to me that this was a ridicule of veta's childish behavior, in fact my first impression was more that it glorified his pathetic trolling. Nonetheless, the ban was probably too severe so I apologize for that. I am going to clarify my point of view on what I will allow and what not for people impersonating (permabanned) accounts so I will update my advisorblog. If you really meant well, you couldn't have know you crossed the line. |
+changeAvatar +chat +play +post +re-register |
jurgen |
3:13 PM, Wednesday September 7, 2011 EDT |
| since you claim to be the real veta, join the permaban |
-changeAvatar -chat -play -post -re-register |
jurgen |
5:08 PM, Friday September 2, 2011 EDT |
| OK, so this ban was just a joke but please no reporting people for fun either. Some days I might just ban these actions. But thx for checking this way if Honda would ban stuff like this :P |
+changeAvatar +chat +play +post |
jurgen |
3:47 PM, Wednesday July 27, 2011 EDT |
| This ban is silly but so is you trying to frame someone on an alt. In fact it's worse. So let's use this as an example shall we?
1 day ban on main, 1 month ban on alt |
-changeAvatar -chat -play -post |
jurgen |
3:27 PM, Wednesday July 27, 2011 EDT |
